英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：

protrude    音标拼音: [protr'ud]
vi. 凸出,伸出,吐出
vt. 使伸出,使突出

凸出,伸出,吐出使伸出,使突出

protrude
v 1: extend out or project in space; "His sharp nose jutted
out"; "A single rock sticks out from the cliff" [synonym:
{stick out}, {protrude}, {jut out}, {jut}, {project}]
2: bulge outward; "His eyes popped" [synonym: {start}, {protrude},
{pop}, {pop out}, {bulge}, {bulge out}, {bug out}, {come
out}]
3: swell or protrude outwards; "His stomach bulged after the
huge meal" [synonym: {bulge}, {pouch}, {protrude}]

Protrude \Pro*trude"\, v. i.
To shoot out or forth; to be thrust forward; to extend beyond
a limit; to project.
[1913 Webster]

The parts protrude beyond the skin. --Bacon.
[1913 Webster]


Protrude \Pro*trude"\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. {Protruded}; p. pr. &
vb. n. {Protruding}.] [L. protrudere, protrusum; pro forward
trudere to thrust. See {Threat}.]
[1913 Webster]
1. To thrust forward; to drive or force along. --Locke.
[1913 Webster]

2. To thrust out, as through a narrow orifice or from
confinement; to cause to come forth.
[1913 Webster]

When . . . Spring protrudes the bursting gems.
--Thomson.
[1913 Webster]


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
protrude查看　protrude　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
protrude查看　protrude　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
protrude查看　protrude　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona - United States Courts
    In this case, the Supreme Court was asked to decide if the age of a juvenile being questioned by police should be taken into consideration when deciding if he or she is in police custody and, therefore, entitled to a Miranda warning
  • Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia
    Because of the defendant's low I Q and poor English-language skills, the U S Court of Appeals ruled that it was a "clear error" when the district court found that Garibay had "knowingly and intelligently waived his Miranda rights "
  • 1966: Miranda v. Arizona - A Latinx Resource Guide: Civil Rights Cases . . .
    In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-incrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution
  • Miranda v. Arizona | Oyez
    Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the opinion of the 5-4 majority, concluding that defendant’s interrogation violated the Fifth Amendment To protect the privilege, the Court reasoned, procedural safeguards were required
  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966) - Justia U. S. Supreme Court Center
    On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda's constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession, and affirmed the conviction 98 Ariz 18, 401 P 2d 721
  • Miranda v. Arizona: The Landmark Decision on Suspect Rights
    Understand the Supreme Court's pivotal 1966 decision that codified the protection against self-incrimination during all police custody The 1966 Supreme Court decision in Miranda v Arizona established a procedural requirement to protect the rights of criminal suspects during police questioning
  • Miranda v. Arizona | Constitution Center
    Miranda’s oral and written confessions are now held inadmissible under the Court’s new rules One is entitled to feel astonished that the Constitution can be read to produce this result
  • Miranda v. Arizona | Definition, Background, Facts | Britannica
    Arizona reversed an Arizona court’s conviction of Ernesto Miranda on charges of kidnapping and rape
  • Miranda v Arizona (1966) - Supreme Court
    Chief Justice Earl Warren announced the decision in 1966 for a Court that split 5-to-4 To enforce the Constitution, Warren wrote, police must warn criminal suspects about the right to stay silent and the right to have a lawyer's help before interrogations begin
  • What was the impact of the Miranda v Arizona case?
    In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009