英文字典中文字典


英文字典中文字典51ZiDian.com



中文字典辞典   英文字典 a   b   c   d   e   f   g   h   i   j   k   l   m   n   o   p   q   r   s   t   u   v   w   x   y   z       







请输入英文单字，中文词皆可：


请选择你想看的字典辞典：
单词字典翻译
trinitee查看　trinitee　在百度字典中的解释百度英翻中〔查看〕
trinitee查看　trinitee　在Google字典中的解释Google英翻中〔查看〕
trinitee查看　trinitee　在Yahoo字典中的解释Yahoo英翻中〔查看〕

安装中文字典英文字典查询工具!


中文字典英文字典工具:
选择颜色:
输入中英文单字

































































英文字典中文字典相关资料:


  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966) - Justia U. S. Supreme Court Center
    Miranda v Arizona: Under the Fifth Amendment, any statements that a defendant in custody makes during an interrogation are admissible as evidence at a criminal trial only if law enforcement told the defendant of the right to remain silent and the right to speak with an attorney before the interrogation started, and the rights were either
  • Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona - United States Courts
    Miranda was found guilty of kidnapping and rape and was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment on each count On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession
  • Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia
    The Miranda warning concept quickly caught on across American law enforcement agencies, who came to call the practice "Mirandizing" Pursuant to the U S Supreme Court decision Berghuis v Thompkins (2010), a suspect must unambiguously invoke the right to remain silent or to counsel
  • Miranda v. Arizona | Oyez
    On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed and held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated because he did not specifically request counsel
  • Miranda v. Arizona | Definition, Background, Facts | Britannica
    Miranda v Arizona, legal case in which the U S Supreme Court on June 13, 1966, established a code of conduct for police interrogations of criminal suspects held in custody
  • 1966: Miranda v. Arizona - A Latinx Resource Guide: Civil Rights Cases . . .
    In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision Miranda v Arizona (1966) ruled that an arrested individual is entitled to rights against self-incrimination and to an attorney under the 5th and 6th Amendments of the United States Constitution
  • Miranda v. Arizona - Landmark Cases of the US Supreme Court
    The U S Supreme Court agreed, deciding that the police had not taken proper steps to inform Miranda of his constitutional rights
  • Miranda v. Arizona | Constitution Center
    Miranda’s oral and written confessions are now held inadmissible under the Court’s new rules One is entitled to feel astonished that the Constitution can be read to produce this result
  • Miranda v. Arizona Outcome: Ruling, Rights, and Legacy
    Learn what the Supreme Court decided in Miranda v Arizona, what rights it created, and how the ruling still shapes police and courtroom practice today
  • Miranda Rights Supreme Court Cases
    Miranda Rights Supreme Court Cases The Fifth Amendment to the U S Constitution protects people suspected of crimes from self-incrimination In Miranda v Arizona, the Supreme Court applied this principle to the context of police questioning





中文字典-英文字典  2005-2009